Finally, after years of rumour, counter rumour and pure wild speculation, Nikon has announced what a lot of people have been crying out for – a successor to the famous Nikon D300.
Nikon did a good job keeping this new camera under the radar. Most CES (Consumer Electronics Show) pre show speculation surrounded their highly anticipated Nikon D5.
Avoiding the Nikon D400 label, the new Nikon D500 appears packed with useful features while keeping the gimmicks to a minimum.
Those shooting in DX, or crop, format have a lot to get excited about.[/vc_column_text][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”8931,8932″ img_size=”large” title=”Nikon D500 Pictures”][vc_column_text]
From my point of view, the biggest attraction is the AF system. The jump to 153 AF points with 99 being cross type (and therefore more accurate) is very attractive.
These 153 focus points can be grouped at 25, 72 or the full 153 points. Driving these AF points is the new Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 20K sensor module.
I jumped from the D300 to the Nikon D7200 and was very impressed by the AF improvements. If a similar leap is made with the new system then those shooting AF critical subjects such as Birds, sports and fast jets are going to be very happy.
One feature that really intrigues me is the button or joystick just under the AF-ON button. Look at the rear view picture above – could this be linked to the AF system and give control over fine AF tuning?
I dont now but am excited to find out.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Other Cool Nikon D500 Features
Again, from my point of view and in no particular order, I really like these cool features.
Touch Sensitive Tilt Screen
I wish the D7200 had been released with a tilt screen. I like to exploit different angles of view and a tilt screen makes this much easier. The fact the D500 has a 3 axis tilt screen is appreciated. Add in that this screen is also touch sensitive is a nice touch (pardon the pun). Not really necessary, but thanks anyway Nikon!
Extended ISO Range
The D500 has a native extended ISO range of up to ISO 51200. This can be expanded up to ISO 1640000. Just how usable 51200 will be remains to be seen, let alone the almost ridiculously high 1640000! The Hi 5 setting may be a bit of a gimmick, but nevertheless there is increased potential for extreme low light photography.
Video
I’ll be honest and admit that I am not overly interested in video. Looking through the D500 specs, it is fairly obvious to a video dunce (aka me) that the D500 is highly competent for video and will also be attractive to videographers.
I am far too busy trying to exploit my camera and lenses to the full to dabble with video, but I could be tempted to at least have a play with video.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Hands On, Availability and Pricing
I am guessing the first opportunity for those in the UK to get hands on will be at The Photography Show in March.
Nikon UK are more than welcome to send me a test unit before then if they want!! Sorry, only dreaming.
Back to being serious, the Nikon D500 camera is another big step forward for those who dont need, or want, to shoot full frame.
Nikon D500 Availability
As for availability, a kit with the Nikon 16-80 VR is available for $3069.95 from the US site. The body only option is not yet available.
The D500 isnt even listed on the UK site yet, but I assume a kit version will be available before the body only option.
One can assume that the Nikon D500 could be available, body only, sometime around March. This is a pure guesstimate on my part.
London Camera Exchange have the body only listed at £1729 as well so it seems a price point has been established.
I am really looking forward to getting my hands on the Nikon D500 to see just how the specs on paper convert into real world usefulness.
Until I can do that, I will be looking through the web to find out as much as I can about this exciting new camera.
Thanks for reading and please let me know what you think about the new Nikon D500.
Cheers
Gary
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator color=”sky” el_width=”80″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_cta h2=”Subscribe to GDMK Images” txt_align=”center” add_button=”bottom” btn_title=”Sign me up I want to get updates on new articles!” btn_custom_background=”#0098da” btn_custom_text=”#fffffd” btn_link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fstaging.gdmkimages.co.uk%2Fsubscribe-gdmk-images-newsletters%2F|title:Subscribe%20and%20get%20a%20heads%20up%20on%20new%20GDMK%20Images%20articles|”]Subscribe to get first notice of new GDMK Images articles![/vc_cta][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Share this Nikon D500 news with your friends and colleagues …. thanks! [juiz_sps buttons=”facebook, twitter, google, pinterest, digg, linkedin, stumbleupon, mail”]
I have owned the D7200 for just over a month now. This article aims to provide information to those wondering if the new Nikon D7200 can genuinely be considered as a D300 replacement (*update 06/01/16 – Nikon D500 released as D300 replacement*). There has been a lot of discussion about Nikons latest DX format DSLR camera. Many are unhappy that there has been no signficant upgrade over the D7100. Whilst this viewpoint may be somewhat justified, this article is aimed at people who haven’t recently upgraded their Nikon bodies. There is a significant population of photographers who have been waiting for the almost mystical D400 to replace the well respected Nikon D300. Many havent upgraded their camera bodies despite several iterations of Nikon DX format DSLR cameras being released. I purchased my Nikon D300 a couple of weeks after initial release just over 7 years ago. Camera sensors, image processors and AF capabilities have significantly improved in that time. Those who have used the D300 will agree with me that it is an extremely capable, robust and solid camera. Indeed, the D300 has been such a good camera that none of the recent releases have been a match for its capabilities. Newer cameras may have improved components and features but none have offered the overall package offered by the D300. A compromise in capability was always required to move away from the D300 – until now. I have been following the stories and rumours about a Nikon D400 for some time. As time goes by it seems less and less likely that this much anticipated camera will ever make an appearance. With this in mind, the Nikon D7200 caught my eye when Nikon announced its release. The D7200 feature list addressed most of what I needed in a camera body. I researched many articles to try and understand the full feature set of the D7200. After handling an example at the ukphotoshow, I took the decision to finally give in and upgrade. This article is written on the basis of my experiences moving from the D300 to the D7200.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Does size matter?
The first obvious feature of the D7200 camera body is its smaller size when compared to the D300. The size difference is not massive but is noticeable. The D7200 is as comfortable in the hand, and is lighter, but you do notice the smaller size. In the side by side photos shown below you can see the size difference of the Nikon D7200 v D300 when viewing from above, the front and rear.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row font_color=”#00478c”][vc_column][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”27205,27206,27207″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The photos above illustrate the size difference but also show the many changes to the cameras controls. Most notable on the top view is the D7200s Mode Dial in place of the D300s dedicated Quality, ISO and WB buttons. The rear view shows a smaller Multi Selector pad on the D7200. You can see the focus area, meter area controls and dedicated AF-ON button controls are missing. I was concerned the removal of these buttons inferred that Nikon had removed key functionality. The D7200 still offers all the D300s functionality, and more besides, albeit the functions are accessed via different controls. Consequently, there is quite a learning curve as you adjust to using these common functions. I will admit to suffering from a bit of frustration as simple operations, that were once instinctive actions, have had to be re-learnt.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row font_color=”#00478c”][vc_column][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”27211,27210″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Nikon D7200 Ergonomics
There are two ergonomic issues I didn’t immediately like about using the D7200. I have to ask why certain simple actions have changed. The two images above illustrate my first dislike. The release dial on the D300 requires the index finger to operate the release button and a twist of the dial with your thumb. The D7200 design has reversed this meaning the thumb releases the dial button and the index finger twists the dial. For whatever reason this just does not feel as comfortable. Many times my index finger has been groping in vain for the release button. When I realise and try to release with the thumb it just feels weird. Secondly, the rear Multi selector pad is smaller on the D7200 and doesn’t have that smooth operation of the D300. The pad is also bulkier and just feels less precise in operation. Other than these two issues, the ergonomics of the D7200 are not too bad. Much of the ergonomic issues I have encountered result from having ingrained muscle memory from using the D300.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Nikon D7200 Operation
After getting past the size and different button arrangements, your next noticeable difference comes when you look through the D7200s viewfinder. You will see that the Focus Mode, Exposure Mode and ISO speed readouts (see update below) are missing. I really dont like this aspect of the camera and do not know why these features are missing. This camera is aimed at semi-pro and advanced amateur photographers, so why remove such a useful facility? The visual representation of this information in the viewfinder is a must have feature in any ‘advanced’ camera. You want to keep the camera to your eye and visual reminders in the viewfinder are crucial. Tsk tsk Nikon – dont think you can release a D7200b or D7250 to cover up for this omission because that wont wash. Back to comparing the D7200 to the D300. Every aspect of the cameras operation has changed and there is a fair learning curve in getting to grips with these changes. I guess this is expected considering the changes that have taken place with camera technology since the release of the D300. The new mode dial brings a lot more functionality to hand quickly. The displaced D300 buttons have been moved and relocated onto the cameras rear panel. The new dial on the D7200 allows quick access to some very useful functionality and I feel is an improvement.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]**Update**
I need to make a slight clarification in regard to viewfinder display information. Following Rods comment below, I double checked the viewfinder readout and found the ISO was showing.
This was enabled by using ‘Easy ISO’ mode in the custom menu settings. When Easy ISO mode is enabled, you control the ISO setting with your thumb on the rear command dial. Also, lo and behold, it enables ISO readout in the viewfinder.
Apologies for this oversight and I hope it hasn’t mislead too many people. I only recently dabbled with the Easy ISO mode and never noticed the correlation between the viewfinder readout and this mode.
The AF modes are a little confusing at first and will take a little time to adjust to. Your familiar 3 way C, S, M AF switch (Continous, Single, Manual) is replaced with a 2 way AF and M switch with a new central button. Essentially you now only choose either AF or M with the toggle. To access the differing AF modes, you hold in the new central button and select the AF mode with the Sub Command dial. To change the AF matrix configuration, hold in the button and rotate the Command dial. Throw in a new AF mode to the mix (AF-A which automatically selects between AF-S or AF-C depending on subject movement) and you have a rich recipe for confusion. If your chosen field of photography needs frequent swapping of focus modes and matrix configurations then you need to get out in the field and practice, practice, practice before you go to an important shoot!
Located above the AF Mode selector switch is a new Bracket button. The D7200 bracketing options have increased over the D300 giving you more creative flexibility.
One unexpected factor I noticed is the D7200s operation speed. I didnt notice this until I went out with both cameras (tele on the D7200 and wide angle on the D300). The D300 was noticeably slower in general operation and when firing off a series of shots. The D7200 has received criticism for its burst mode and poor high speed shooting capabilities. All I can say is when shooting 6 or 7 consecutive shots, the D7200 is noticeably faster than the D300 in getting those 6 or 7 shots off. I always regarded my D300 as perfectly capable for getting off continous sequences so am pleasantly surprised by this discovery.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”27209,27208″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Nikon D7200 Customisations
There is no denying it – the Nikon D7200 is a complex bit of kit. With this complexity comes a generous number of customisation options. Almost every button and function can be customised to tweak almost every camera mode. With a little time and experimentation, you can customise your own D7200 to become a highly personalised tool honed to your photographic niche. The trusty ‘My Menu’ option, whereby often used menu options are added to your own menu for quick access, is still available. Added to this are the two user settings, U1 and U2, on the mode dial. You can set very specific camera functionality and store it in one of two user slots. You can then quickly swap between these settings by moving the dial to U1 or U2 and load the settings. This is useful if you swap between two subjects that need different camera operation – for instance swapping quickly from fast sports photography to macro photography. Each of those scenarios need differing settings and these user slots make multiple setting changes very easy.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Nikon D7200 Ruggedness
The D7200 does not have the full armouring and water resistance of the D300. Many have commented that this is an obvious omission by Nikon. I have to agree somewhat, but also in the 7 and a bit years of owning a D300, I never dropped my camera to test its actual ruggedness. I will handle the D7200 with the same care so (fingers crossed) I wont have need to see how robust or brittle the newer camera is. As for weatherproofing, well I got caught in a monstrous rain shower on the Charles bridge in Prague. I am happy to say the D7200 and my lenses survived perfectly well. If the camera survived this downpour then I have no worries going forward in respect of weatherproofing.
A short clip from the rainstorm is shown below.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_video link=”https://youtu.be/q1CjwQpNHOI”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Nikon D7200 New Features
As mentioned the D7200 offers many new technologies and features that weren’t available at the D300s release. It goes without saying that the D7200 hardware is a significant upgrade over that employed in the D300. The sensor is a far more capable 24mp device as opposed to the original 12mp sensor. The image processor is 3 generations newer and the AF module is extremely capable. In short, and without getting into the technical intricacies of each component, the sensor, AF and image processing is very good. Moving on to the new features I particularly like some of the additions. I like the new quiet shutter mode. The cameras operation doesnt become silent, but is somewhat quieter for those situations where noise may be an issue. The AF-A mode could be interesting. To be honest I like to have direct control over the AF mode. I select either single servo or continous servo depending on the subject matter. I will experiment with this new AF-A mode to see if it is reliable and accurate enough to correctly identify subject movement. One feature I really like is the wireless control via mobile phone. The mobile app is available for both Android and Apple devices via their respective app stores. Once downloaded, you can connect the D7200 and mobile device via wireless and control the camera via Live View. The app will display the scene seen through the viewfinder and gives you the ability to trigger the shutter from your phone. This is perfect when the camera is placed in awkward positions and may save you a few aches and pains! The app has more functionality and is a great addition. One other feature that I like is the delayed shutter mode. You can select a predetermined time for the shutter to operate once the mirror has raised. This is ideal for those circumstances where the slightest camera movement may affect the sharpness of your image.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Is the D7200 really the D400?
From my viewpoint, the D7200 probably isnt the D400 per se. Having said that, the Nikon D7200 is an extremely competent and feature rich camera that I am sure will satisfy anyone waiting for Nikons next real move in the ‘semi-pro’ and ‘pro-sumer’ niche. The upgrade in sensor, AF Module and image processor is enough alone to justify my decision in upgrading to a D7200. Add in the features I discuss above and you have at hand an extremely competent camera. A camera that is capable of delivering top quality images coupled with an extremely useful range of features. Features that are customisable to such a degree that you can create a fine tuned instrument honed to your particular photography niche.
It may not be the D400 but the Nikon D7200 is definitely the camera I have been waiting for. Of most importance to me is the change to the D7200 hasnt compromised any of the capabilities my D300 provided. I now have an exceptional main camera and an extremely competent and proven back up. If the D400 never materialises then I have an exceptional camera that will serve me just fine for a long time. If the D400 does ever appear, then it will need a genre breaking feature set priced somewhere around the £1500 mark for me to even consider dropping the D7200.
I’m beginning to the think the D7200 has made the Nikon D400 irrelevant. The D7200 is set to serve me well for a long time and my next upgrade may not be the D400 at all, but a step up to Full Frame – now that is a completely different kettle of fish!
I hope this article has been informative.
I’d love to hear your views, so why not leave a comment below?
Thanks Gary[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator color=”sky” el_width=”70″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column font_color=”#00478c”][vc_cta h2=”Subscribe to GDMK Images” h2_font_container=”color:%2300478c” h2_google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal” h4_google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” txt_align=”center” color=”sky” add_button=”bottom” btn_title=”Sign me up I want to know about new GDMK Images articles” btn_align=”center” style=”outline” btn_style=”outline” use_custom_fonts_h2=”true” use_custom_fonts_h4=”true” btn_button_block=”true” btn_color=”sky” shape=”round” btn_shape=”round” btn_size=”md” btn_link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fstaging.gdmkimages.co.uk%2Fsubscribe-gdmk-images-newsletters%2F||”]Be the first to know when new GDMK Images articles are available[/vc_cta][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
If you liked this article then why not share it with someone you know who will also find it interesting …. thanks![juiz_sps buttons=”facebook, twitter, google, pinterest, digg, linkedin, stumbleupon, mail”]
April has been busy with quite a lot happening behind the scenes.
March ended with a visit to the Photography Show at Birminghams NEC. As usual there was a lot to see and do. I took the opportunity to look first hand at some new wall art products. As a result there will be some new additions to the catalogue for mounting images upon.
I was able to finally buy a Nikon D7200. The camera is pretty impressive and my initial reaction is positive. The D7200 feels a lot smaller in the hand than I expected. My only issue so far, is that Lightroom and Camera RAW still don’t support the new NEFs. I guess this is fair enough as all new releases take a while to get supported by 3rd party products. I am hoping when Lightroom 6 gets released (potentially this week) the NEF files will have support.
I have been looking at the first thousand or so images with Nikons View NX-I and I am impressed with the detail and resolution. I havent processed any so far as I have a structured Lightroom workflow and dont want to mess up the system – however tempted I am to get to grips with them!
Unfortunately I couldnt get the Sigma 150-600S lens at the Photography Show as planned. Following the show I did hire one for a week so I could get a sample of what the lens could do coupled to the D7200. All I can say is – WOW, what a combination!
As soon as supplies pick up I will be ordering one.
I am still reviewing and revising old blog posts as mentioned last month. Parts 2 & 3 of my Aviation Photography Techniques guide have been posted with part 4 coming over the next couple of weeks.
Both the stock photo and wall art photo portfolios are expanding with new and varied content. The new stock photography additions focus on the ongoing construction of ‘The Crescent’ shopping centre in Hinckley. There is also a good number of additions from a visit to Newton Abbot and Exeter.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_media_grid element_width=”3″ gap=”3″ item=”mediaGrid_SimpleOverlay” filter_size=”md” include=”1088,1087,1086,1085″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1450788618404-a9010b8a-dfcb-9″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
A small selection of the latest additions to my stock photo portfolio.
A random selection of the latest photos added to my stock photo portfolio.[/vc_column_text][vc_media_grid element_width=”3″ gap=”1″ item=”mediaGrid_SimpleOverlay” filter_size=”md” include=”1018,1021,1024,1026,1093,1092,1084,1083″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1450788618479-e6c7aa83-55c7-10″][vc_btn title=”See 60 Latest Stock Photos” shape=”round” align=”center” color=”primary” size=”md” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alamy.com%2Flbx.asp%3F777804||target:%20_blank”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]On the Wall Art front, I have been practising with some new digital art techniques. The first image using this new style is shown below and depicts a World War 1 soldier. The style is evolving and I intend to upload a small range featuring more pictures in this style. Let me know your thoughts on the style.[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”1089″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_rounded” onclick=”custom_link” link=”http://www.photos.staging.gdmkimages.co.uk/digital-art/e41eb3fa9″][vc_btn title=”See Latest Wall Art” shape=”round” align=”center” color=”primary” size=”md” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fphotos.staging.gdmkimages.co.uk||”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Need Wall Art ideas?
Below are examples of the products you can mount your chosen picture onto. There are many wall art products for mounting pictures from my portfolio including –
Canvas
Framed
Wood Blocks
Framed Canvas
Metal
As mentioned earlier, I will be adding some new products over the coming weeks. In the meantime have a look at my current wall art product range.[/vc_column_text][vc_media_grid element_width=”2″ gap=”1″ filter_size=”md” include=”1057,1056,1055,1054,955,956″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1450788618698-6fce6206-e156-4″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Going forward you can expect to see part 4 of my Aviation Photography Techniques series. I have two new location reports from my old blog that are being updated to reflect recent changes.
Additionally I will be visiting Budapest and Prague in the next couple of weeks. I will be adding trip reports of both these cities when I get back.
After my return I will be posting my experiences of using the new Nikon D7200 and a post about my weeks hire of the Sigma 150-600 S lens.
Thanks for taking the time to read this update and looking at my portfolio updates. Please feel free to leave any comments about the site layout and fuctionality, portfolios or anything else that comes to mind.
Cheers
Gary[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator color=”sky” el_width=”70″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column font_color=”#00478c”][vc_cta h2=”Subscribe to GDMK Images” h2_font_container=”color:%2300478c” h2_google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal” h4_google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” txt_align=”center” color=”sky” add_button=”bottom” btn_title=”Sign me up I want to know about new GDMK Images articles” btn_align=”center” style=”outline” btn_style=”outline” btn_color=”sky” shape=”round” btn_shape=”round” btn_size=”md” use_custom_fonts_h2=”true” use_custom_fonts_h4=”true” btn_button_block=”true” btn_link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fstaging.gdmkimages.co.uk%2Fsubscribe-gdmk-images-newsletters%2F||”]Be the first to know when new GDMK Images articles are available[/vc_cta][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Share this GDMK Images news update with your friends and colleagues …. thanks![juiz_sps buttons=”facebook, twitter, google, pinterest, digg, linkedin, stumbleupon, mail”]
Aircraft Photography Tips – Choosing Camera Metering Modes, Exposure Modes And Exposure Compensation
In my first post on aircraft photography, called aircraft photography tips part 1, I discussed essential camera modes and looked at some of the currently available lenses.
Specifically, I mentioned the importance of control over certain camera modes of your chosen camera.
Those camera modes were –
metering mode – centre weighted and spot
manual control of exposure compensation
auto modes – aperture priority and shutter priority
Lets look at these camera modes to understand how and why they affect the finished image.
The article will talk in depth about the technical aspects of camera exposure. My aim is to make the article interesting enough for those with some knowledge of the subject without being too complex for beginners. Please let me know if I was successful in this approach!
Camera Metering Modes
One of the most important factors in any type of photography is to understand and interpret the varying light levels in your chosen scene. The photographer then needs to understand how the selected metering mode will affect the camera in achieving the final exposure.
In general photography, the majority of scenes will consist of evenly lit subjects.
Multi area matrix metering, which evaluates the relative brightness of subjects in the whole scene, is usually very good at selecting an exposure that will render the colours and brightness levels in a very authentic manner.
I am sure we have all experienced scenes that have more sky or shadow and see that the resultant image has either nice shadow detail and a burnt out sky or a nice sky and dark shadows.
This is because the matrix metering is trying to evaluate an unevenly lit scene. Whichever element, bright sky or dark shadows, forms the majority of the scene will be judged to be the most important and the camera exposes accordingly.
It is extremely important to remember that aircraft in the air are comparatively small and dark against a big bright (hopefully blue!) background.
If you choose wide area matrix metering modes you are going to quickly run into underexposed shots.
With multi area matrix metering, the camera sees a large bright expanse of sky dominating the scene and exposes for an overall bright image. Typically you will get a nice blue sky and a black or dark grey aircraft.
Because the aircraft are relatively small compared to the whole scene, you must compensate against this by selecting centre weighted or spot metering mode.
These two camera modes reduce the amount of the overall scene that the camera measures when computing exposure.
Centre Weighted Metering
Centre weighted metering simply means that the exposure calculations made by the camera put more emphasis on the readings detected in the centre of the image.
Typically, centre weighted metering will put the emphasis on about 8-15% of the scene. The brightness levels of the whole scene are still evaluated, but the camera adjusts the exposure so that the readings taken from that 8-15% are given the greatest emphasis in its calculations.
One thing to remember is that each brand implements their metering modes slightly differently, and the sophistication of weighting calculations vary as well.
Lower end models may have a fixed value of emphasis and have the centre weighting fixed to the centre of the focusing area.
With the more expensive cameras in any given range, you will find the sophistication of the systems increase.
You will find that you can control the size of the centre weighting in steps somewhere between 8-15% and that this weighting is not fixed but follows the selected focusing point.
Spot Metering
Spot metering is simply a more extreme version of centre weighted metering. The emphasis is now placed on an area as low as 1 or 2% of the scene. Again, each brand implements the feature slightly differently and the sophistication increases as you move higher into the brand range.
Spot metering is a key feature and is not always included in the lower end models so make sure any model of camera you look at has spot metering.
It is extremely important to remember that aircraft in the air are comparatively small and dark against a big bright (hopefully blue!) background
So, by understanding how cameras evaluate a scene, and how the user can select a weighting mode, you should be able to see how a more accurate exposure of our aircraft against a bright sky can be achieved.
Although cameras metering modes are becoming extremely sophisticated and competent, they are still not fool-proof in getting that well-exposed aircraft photo.
This is where the next important camera feature – exposure compensation, comes in to help.
Exposure Compensation
So far we have looked at how we can choose a metering mode that will help the camera to interpret the scene as we want it to.
Exposure compensation allows you to directly adjust the calculated exposure value by a set amount of either over or under exposure.
By manually controlling exposure compensation, you are further controlling the final calculated exposure.
Most modern DSLR cameras allow you to manually ‘dial-in’ a fixed adjustment to the calculated exposure value.
Depending on your camera, you can usually add in between +2 and -2 stops of exposure in steps of either 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments.
I like to dial in up to +0.7 exposure for small aircraft and +0.3 exposure for larger aircraft, but you will find that the exact compensation is a matter of trial and error depending on the light encountered on the day.
I do this because a smaller aircraft means more bright sky affecting the calculation so I want the camera to overexpose slightly more on its calculation. A larger aircraft means less bright sky so the camera is more likely to calculate a more pleasing exposure so only a small adjustment is needed.
Don’t be afraid to take test images – review the histogram and fine tune your adjustments. As the light changes during the day, you will probably need to make adjustments anyway.
In the example below, a single F-16 trails vapour at an airshow. The camera sees a large tract of bright blue sky as the dominant feature in the scene.
Belgian Air Force F-16 aeroplane trailing white vapour trails during an airshow display
By selecting either spot or centre-weighted metering, adding exposure compensation and framing your target aircraft in the area of emphasis, you can increase the chances of a good exposure.
In this example I had +0.3 dialled in and used spot metering exposure mode.
Lets look at the next features – aperture priority and shutter priority modes
Auto Exposure Modes – Aperture Priority and Shutter Priority
We use the camera as a tool to calculate that ‘x’ amount of light needs to get to the sensor to produce a ‘good exposure’.
The previous section looked at how we help the camera calculate a good exposure, now its time to look at how the camera executes that exposure.
Camera exposure basics
Exposure is controlling the amount of light hitting the camera sensor.
In basic terms, every lens has an adjustable opening, called its aperture, that controls how much light entering the front of the lens is passed through to the sensor.
The shutter speed controls how long the sensor is exposed to the light coming through the lenses aperture.
The exposure calculation simply means the camera needs to let ‘x’ amount of light get to the sensor.
To get ‘x’ amount of light onto the sensor, the camera selects an appropriate combination of aperture and shutter speed.
In pure ‘auto’ or commonly ‘P’ mode, the camera will select both values and operate the shutter.
Essentially, Aperture Priority and Shutter Priority are still camera ‘auto’ modes, but importantly execute that exposure based on the user choosing to directly control either the aperture value or shutter speed.
By using Aperture Priority or Shutter Priority modes, we are taking more direct control on how the camera is generating the image.
So what does that all this mean in simpler terms?
Differences between Shutter Priority and Aperture Priority camera modes
In shutter priority mode, the user can select an exact shutter speed and the camera will choose an appropriate aperture to ensure the exposure corresponds to our ‘x’ amount of light.
Conversely in aperture priority mode, the user selects an aperture and the camera will calculate the appropriate shutter speed for our ‘x’ amount of light.
So, if aperture priority and shutter priority both do a similar thing, why bother differentiating between them – why not just use whatever mode you are comfortable with?
Unfortunately, it isn’t that simple if you want the best results. You will find to get the best photos, you will be regularly swapping between both modes depending on the type of aircraft, lighting conditions and mood you want to create.
So, if aperture priority and shutter priority both do a similar thing, why bother differentiating between them – why not just use whatever mode you are comfortable with? Unfortunately it isn’t that simple if you want the best results.
Benefits of Aperture Priority mode
Lets look at a couple of environmental issues you will likely face when out and about –
you are using a telephoto (and probably heavy) lens
your subject could be moving extremely fast (military jets) or painfully slow (older prop aircraft)
the wind is probably going to be blowing you about
the lens hood will be acting as a sail increasing the effects of any wind
Very quickly you are going to run into the problem of camera shake and blurred images. The aim is sharp images so you want the fastest shutter speed obtainable.
In aperture priority mode, you can select an aperture of f2.8 or f4 (on more expensive lenses), f5.6 ( most common on cheaper telephotos), f8, f11, f16, f22 and maybe f32.
You choose an aperture and the camera automatically chooses an appropriate shutter speed to give a good exposure. That amounts to 7 options (slightly more if including intermediate apertures between each major ‘stop’).
The aperture options for you to select are restricted to the physical quality and abilities of the lens.
Hidden dangers of Shutter Priority Mode
In shutter priority mode, you can select a shutter speed anywhere from 30 seconds through to 1/4000th of a second. That is a lot of options.
This is where you need to be really careful and understand the concepts of exposure.
Starting with aperture priority, let’s consider an average bright day with ISO set to 200.
The table below shows examples of typical shutter speeds your camera will generate for a given aperture.
f5.6 1/1600
f8 1/800
f11 1/400
f16 1/200
f22 1/100
From this you can see the suitable shutter speeds for good exposure range from 1/1600th to 1/100th of a second.
Herein lies a trap for the unwary.
In shutter priority mode, you can select any shutter speed you want. If you choose a faster shutter speed, the camera will need to select a wider aperture to let more light in. If the lens doesn’t support a wide enough aperture to allow enough light in for a balanced exposure, you will get an underexposed image.
Conversely, you can select a 1 second exposure, but if the lens doesn’t have a small enough aperture to automatically restrict the light sufficiently you will create an overexposed image.
If you are using shutter priority mode, you need to be conscious of this. In the heat of the action, you might want to get a faster shutter speed and not realise you are already at the limit of the available apertures.
How I use shutter priority and aperture priority camera modes
To manage shutter speeds I use aperture priority mode to obtain the fastest possible shutter speed while safely staying within acceptable exposure values.
I do this because, in aperture priority mode, once you get to the widest aperture, you cannot make any further adjustments. The camera will have selected the fastest possible shutter speed for that aperture and ISO setting.
This is why you should use aperture priority mode to select your fastest possible shutter speed.
Herein lies a trap for the unwary. You can select a faster shutter speed, but because the lens doesn’t support a wide enough aperture to allow enough light in for a balanced exposure, you will get an underexposed image.
When starting out in aviation photography, you want to aim for 1/1000th of a second shutter speed as a minimum – if you see lower speeds than say 1/320th, you really need consider turning up your ISO setting.
If you find you are still seeing lower shutter speeds and are approaching ISO 640 or higher, you need to see part 4 where I will discuss some techniques to help you through this problem.
There is an awful lot more to choosing appropriate apertures, shutter speeds and photographing aircraft, but the above lays out the basics for those starting out in aviation photography. If followed, with a little practice, you should be on the road to getting some acceptable images. Once you are getting a good hit rate using these basics you can look into some of the more advanced techniques and aspects of aviation photography in the upcoming parts 3 and 4 of my series.
So in summary
use either centre or spot metering modes to reduce the effects of a bright background on your subject
use exposure compensation to further control exposure
use aperture priority mode to get the fastest shutter speed whilst staying within a band of appropriate exposure values
beware of incorrect exposure by relying on shutter priority mode
By now you might be asking why bother mentioning shutter priority mode at all – why not stop in aperture priority mode?
That’s all for now folks, thanks for reading and I hope you have learnt something useful from this article. Please don’t be afraid to leave your own tips or question on what I have discussed above.
So after taking a few days to digest the news and opinions generated by the actual release, it seems the much anticipated Nikon D400 might actually be here at last.
For those, including me, awaiting an evolution of the classic Nikon D300/D300s model I think its probably time we moved on and accepted the Nikon D7200 is ‘the evolution’ we have been waiting for.
Looking at the specs, its hard to see what else could be seriously expected. More importantly, what other features do crop body users seriously NEED over and above what the D7200 offers?
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/6″][vc_column_text]
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Its immediately obvious that the Nikon D7200 is vastly superior in features compared to the Nikon D300 – well lets face facts, it should be as the D300 is 8 years old.
But in reality the comparison is pointless. The Nikon D300 is still an excellent camera. It is solid, rugged and full of adequate features. But it is undeniably 8 years old. 8 years in an environment where the technology is evolving significantly every 2 years or so.
The real question is what should the Nikon D300 replacement really look like feature wise?[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
What could or should a Nikon D300 replacement offer?
So bearing in mind the image processor and AF System from the Pro Full Frame range of Nikon cameras have been used in the D7200, what could the D300 replacement offer over and above what the D7200 offers?
Keep to the forefront of your mind that, body only, the D7200 is less than £1000. Slowly the penny should be dropping that this it, there is no logical reason to pursue the D400 dream.
If the D400 is to come to life, what features would it need to have to justify its place in the market?
Is there anything in the Nikon Pro Full Frame range that could trickle down and make a significant improvement without taking the body into the Pro price range?
Slowly the penny should be dropping that this it, there is no logical reason to pursue the D400 dream.
One could surmise that any Nikon D300 replacement would feature some significant upgrades, but I dont see any gaps in the existing Nikon product range that would justify ‘another’ DX body on top of the D7200.
I also believe the next large steps in Nikon development will be in the FF pro range. I would be extremely surprised to see a revolutionary DX model with ground breaking features being released and those new features then being rolled out into new Full Frame pro body.
I think the main areas of concern for most photographers are –
the camera can focus fast and accurately
images are registered accurately by a good quality sensor
images are processed fast and efficiently so you can carry on shooting.
From what I can see the D7200 does just that, and judging by the rave reviews of the Nikon D750 (where components for 2 of these 3 features come from), should do it very well.
A shortcoming in any of those three key areas makes the camera unsuitable for this market niche – pro-sumer, semi-pro or whatever you want to label it.
For those already with a D7100, then I agree the ‘evolution’ is somewhat less appealing. Although it could be argued the D7100s main weakness, if it had one, was the buffer. That buffer shortcoming has now been addressed with an impressive 27 consecutive 12 bit RAWs. Check out the Nikon D7100 v D7200 comparison chart for a detailed side by side comparison.
Any faster throughput begs the question as to why you NEED to machine gun any more shots out of a single burst?
It could also be argued that a step change is necessary in this market niche. Moving towards 80 or 90 focus points with added cross type AF points would be useful. Getting nearer to double digit FPS could also be useful. More fine control over the AF tracking system would be very useful. What about eye movement detection to control the AF points?
All sound very nice but two issues come to mind. Firstly, some of these features are already available in the Pro range. Secondly there will be an additional hit to the wallet.
How much extra do you want to spend? Or in reality, how much more do you NEED to spend. Once you start heading towards the £1500, £1600 or even £1700 price point you start drifting away from the niche you are serving. Nikon also risk customers dropping out of the Pro range market and going for a product, that is undeniably, extremely competent and at a fraction of the cost.
What about jumping ship to another brand instead of waiting for a D300 replacement?
Well what else is there out in the market place?
The Sony A77ii? Now this is a nice looking camera. I love the colours and ‘look’ of the images from my NEX-6, so perhaps this is a contender?
Lets quickly look at the three features mentioned above.
Autofocus
The A77ii does offer more focus points at 79 compared to Nikons 51.
But, is the AF module comparable? Are those 79 AF points better managed and integrated on the Sony?
The short answer is I dont think so. I havent used a Sony A77ii but looking through the myriad of opinions, I havent seen any conclusive arguments to convince me the Sony 79 are better or worse than Nikons 51.
The Canon 7D2, although not a direct comparison, has 65 AF points and importantly, all are cross type sensors compared to both the Nikons and Sonys 15 cross types. The Canon also has options to make more subtle alterations to the AF tracking of moving objects. That is definitely something worth having on your feature list – but do you want fork out another £500 for the privilege?
Image Processing
When looking at image processing, both the Canon and Sony cant match the low light performance of the Nikon processor.
The Sony cant match low light performance partly due to the translucent mirror arrangement which loses around 0.5 EV. In regard to the Canon 7D2 in simple terms, across the board in this price range, Canon just cant match Nikons quality in its shadow detail.
For me personally, despite the D7200 having class leading modules from the Nikon pro range in the autofocus and image processing modules, the one single over-riding factor is how Nikon have integrated the metering and focusing system.
In spot metering mode, neither the Sony or the Canon has tied the metering system to the selected AF point. If you do use spot metering with the Sony or Canon, you are tied to the central AF point.
That is a massive deal for a lot of photographers – or at least it should be. It frees up creativity in compositions out in the field and removes the need to make a creative crop in post processing.
If you are wanting to shoot sport, fast moving action such as birds in flight or aircraft at airshows, this feature seals the deal.
Again looking back at my three critical factors, rightly or wrongly, the D7200 is the only one to tick all the boxes.
It could be argued that an articulated rear screen should be fitted as standard. It could also be argued that the D7200 isnt a full metal body. I think the removal of the back focus button is a mistake (but its also gone from the D750). But on the scale of things, these are minor issues.
Looking back at the introduction I asked a serious question – what other features do crop body users seriously NEED over and above what the D7200 offers?
Hand on heart, I cant think of anything and my order has been submitted.
And for that reason the D7200 is, at last, the Nikon D300 replacement.
As I said earlier, the King is dead, long live the King!
Thanks for reading, I would love to hear your views so please leave your thoughts on the new King below.
Cheers
Gary
** UPDATE **
Following on from this post I eventually purchased a Nikon D7200 – read my thoughts in this post – Nikon D7200 v D300 one month later[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator color=”sky” el_width=”70″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
If you liked this article then why not share it with someone you know who will also find it interesting …. thanks!
Aircraft Photography Tips Part 1 – Cameras And Lenses
This post on aircraft photography has been refreshed and updated in June 2016 to take account of the latest lens releases.
Aircraft photography can present a number of issues which can catch out the casual photographer. My updated article shares a few tips with you on how I approach photographing aeroplanes. I have listed the main factors this aircraft photography series will look at below –
cameras
lenses
appropriate camera modes
general camera technique.
Camera Specs
For aircraft photography, you ideally want an SLR camera that allows the user to select both spot and centre weighted metering modes. Choosing a camera with the ability to switch between these metering modes will make consistently reliable exposures a lot easier to obtain. It is important to note that not all entry level cameras will have a spot metering mode so make sure you check the specs out on any camera you are looking to buy.
Your chosen camera will also need shutter priority and aperture priority exposure modes.
Finally, check the camera has manual control of exposure compensation.
Some compact cameras and bridge cameras look appealing because they feature long reach lenses. Check the specs to make sure any bridge or compact camera has the features and modes mentioned above. The ability to mix and match metering and exposure modes is more valuable than lens reach.
Shutter Lag
If you have, or choose to buy, a compact or bridge camera then pay close attention to the cameras shutter lag specification. Shutter lag is the amount of time between you pressing the shutter button and the shutter operating. This time difference is referred to as shutter lag and ideally needs to be as close to zero as possible. I guarantee there is nothing more frustrating than to frame perfectly your subject matter but miss the shot because of shutter lag.
I use a Sony Nex-6 for general walking about or if travelling light, and many times shutter lag has caught me out because I am used to the instant response of my Nikon DSLR. So shutter lag can be a real problem photographing planes.
If using a compact or bridge camera be sure to look at the cameras shutter lag specification. There’s nothing more frustrating than to frame your image perfectly then miss the shot because of shutter lag.
Whatever camera system you have, or choose to buy, to consistently get good aircraft photo’s you will need to get intimately familiar with the following camera features
aperture and shutter priority modes
exposure compensation controls
metering modes – matrix, centre weighted and spot.
These terms might seem a bit daunting at first – you will need to practice and experiment to really understand the subtle differences of each function, but your persistence will be rewarded.
Having a good understanding of what these camera modes do, in which circumstances to use them, and how to quickly change between them is very important.
To get consistently good aircraft pictures you need to focus on the action unfolding in front of you and not get distracted by operating the camera.
you will need to practice and experiment to really understand the subtle differences of each function, but your persistence will be rewarded.
Which Camera For Aviation Photography?
The choice of cameras available are overwhelming, but almost any of the current crop of DSLRs are capable of delivering good results, providing they feature the modes and features mentioned above.
I suggest a DX or crop factor camera will be of more benefit than a full frame camera. The ‘crop effect’ of the smaller sensor gives you a ‘free’ boost to your zoom lens of up to 1.5x magnification.
Try not to get caught by GAS – Gear Acquisition Syndrome. Buying the newest, latest and greatest lens, camera or whatever is absolutely no guarantee of success.
Having a solid understanding of your camera and lens performance and then applying that knowledge to your subject matter is the real key to success.
Lenses
The lens you invest in will depend on many factors not just how deep your pocket is.
The first question you need to ask yourself is what type of aviation photography do you want to undertake. If you are looking at capturing larger and slower moving commercial aircraft at your local airport, the lens choice could be a lot different to getting fast moving fighter aircraft at airshows or low level in the Mach Loop.
As silly as it sounds, if you are looking at the civil aviation scene, any lens between 24mm or 28mm through to 300mm will have its uses.
If smaller warbirds or modern fighter aircraft are more your thing then a telephoto lens with a reach of at least 300mm is a good starting point.
Its pretty straight forward deciding on exactly what lens range you want – the smaller your target the longer reach you need from your lens and vice versa.
I used to use a Sigma 100-300mm EX f4 lens sometimes combined with the Sigma 1.4x teleconvertor. This combination gave 460mm reach which equates to 640mm when factoring in the crop factor of a Nikon DX format camera. This combination has served me well and has yielded good results. It didnt have image stabilisation (IS) or vibration reduction (VR) but is a solid lens giving good results.
I sold, and am still selling, many aircraft pictures used with that lens combo.
What lenses might be considered suitable for aviation photography?
Generally speaking, speed of focus and image sharpness at the long end of the zoom range are the most important factors in choosing a lens for aircraft photography. At the end of the day there is no point in having 300mm or more of lens reach yet the autofocus cant keep up with a fast moving jet. Conversely, lightning fast focus is no use if the image is that soft that it might as well be out of focus!]
Entrance Level Zoom Lenses
As with everything in life, focus speed and image sharpness generally improve in proportion to the price tag.
Starting with the cheaper options, Nikon offers a reasonably cheap Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR which could be used as a first lens. Reviews suggest the lens isnt particularly fast focussing and the image sharpness drops noticeably between 200mm and 300mm.
Moving up a bit in quality and performance is the new Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED which is supposed to be very good and offers better VR and features better quality lens glass.
Sigma offer the 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS and Tamron offer the SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD.
All three lenses are reasonable performing mid range zoom lenses and wont cost a fortune.
More importantly, if you decide aircraft photography is not your thing, you wont be greatly out of pocket and will have a good lens that is perfectly suitable for many other styles of photography.
Intermediate Range Zoom Lenses
As you move further up the quality and price range you will come across the new Nikkor AF VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED which features improved optical quality, auto focus performance and VR.
The traditional alternatives, and until recently the aviation photographers lenses of choice, are the Sigma 50-500mm f4-6.3 APO DG OS HSM and Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO. Both lenses are well respected for aviation photography and the debate still rages as to which lens is the better. In simple terms both are very good lenses, especially if you can get one second hand. Reports seem to suggest the Sigma 150-500mm lens is slightly better than the Sigma 50-500mm. The former is also cheaper but both lenses get good reviews.
Reports seem to suggest the Sigma 150-500mm lens is slightly better than the Sigma 50-500mm. The former is also cheaper and both lenses get good reviews.
Next up is the Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM which is very well respected amongst wildlife photographers as well as aviation photographers but comes with an even bigger price tag.
In a similar price range is the Canon 100-400mm L f4.5-f5.6 which is coveted by Canon photographers. As a Nikon user I cannot comment either way, but reviews and discussions around the web indicate this is a very good lens for Canon owners.
As mentioned earlier, the two Sigma lenses were the defacto lenses of choice for aviation photography until very recently.
Tamron, and more recently Sigma, shook up the market with new lens offerings. Both companies have released a 150-600mm zoom lens with exceptional image quality. Sigma even released two versions – one in their C or Contemporary range and one in the S or Sport range. The S version has better optics and is aimed squarely at sports photographers and has a price to match. The Tamron and Sigma C lenses are priced similarly to the 150-500mm and 50-500m lenses which seems to indicate that they will take over the mantle of ‘go to’ lenses for aviation photographers.
These three lenses get rave reviews and seem to have significantly raised the bar in terms of affordability versus optical quality and image sharpness.
More recently Nikon released their 200-500mm f5.6 VR lens. This is similar in price to the Tamron 150-600mm and the Sigma 150-600 C lenses. The Nikon has a slight edge in that it features a constant f5.6 aperture throughout the zoom range. As a negative it only goes to a maximum zoom of 500mm.
For what it is worth, I tried both Sigma 150-600’s and the 200-500 side by side on a Nikon D7200 and ended up buying the Nikon 200-500 lens.
The Nikon just seemed to focus faster and the VR seemed smoother in operation and looked steadier. It was purely a subjective test but I went with my gut feeling when making a decision.
It should be noted that once you start looking beyond the three 70-300mm zoom lenses I mentioned, you are looking at very good lenses that are going to set you back a decent sum of money. They shouldnt be viewed as casual purchases and are only suitable if you want to seriously get into aircraft photography.
One saving grace is that many are upgrading from their 50-500’s and 150-500’s so there is a chance of picking up one of these proven performers second hand at good prices.
A factor you may overlook in your lens choice is the weight. A standard 70-300mm lens will weigh somewhere around the 750g to 1kg mark. The 150-600mm lenses are going to weigh in between 2 and 2.5kg. You are going to notice the weight after an hour or so at an airshow!
Superzoom Lenses
I purposely havent included any of the superzooms in the 18-200mm or 300mm range. This is primarily because there is a lot going on inside a wide angle superzoom lens and many optical compromises are made to fit all that zoom range into a single lens. There is a place for the superzooms in photography, and I have considered getting one, but not for aviation photography.
I do feel that if you are seriously looking at aviation photography and are tempted by the superzooms then you will be better served by separate lenses. A good 70-300mm for flying aircraft and a wide angle lens for aircraft on the ground will serve you better as opposed to a single superzoom lens.
You can get very close to the action at some airports, so a wider angle view lens can result in some interesting alternatives to the standard 3/4 front landing type image. Indeed, you may find the shorter end of a 150-500 or 600 lens isnt short enough and end up missing shots!
Long Prime Lenses
I purposely havent discussed the various prime lenses such as the 400mm, 500mm or 600mm lenses purely for the reason that they are out of the budget range of many photographers. Needless to say, they are generally exceptional lenses but come with eye watering price tags well out of reach of the average photographer.
I havent discussed the various prime lenses such as the 300mm, 400mm or 500mm purely for the reason that they are out of the budget range of many photographers
There are many differing opinions on lenses so please feel free to comment or get in touch if you want to discuss these lens options and their relevant pros and cons in more depth.
So in summary, I have suggested a camera system that allows the user to select and control the following
metering mode – centre weighted and spot
auto modes – aperture priority and shutter priority
manual control of exposure compensation.
I also suggested a telephoto zoom lens with a reach of around 300mm. Next time we will look in more depth at the camera exposure and metering modes mentioned above.
So the Nikon D7200 will officially be announced soon…?
The much talked about and anticipated new Nikon dxxxx seems to indeed be the D7200. Nikon Rumors has been talking about a possible new Nikon camera release for a while. Could it also be the long awaited D300 successor?
Video: 1080p @60 and 720p @120 (not sure about 4k)
Video aperture will be adjustable during live view
So almost 2 years after release, the D7100 almost has a successor. Does this release also seal the fate of the hotly debated and anticipated D400? Well, as usual, the answer is nobody knows.
Considering the D300s was released in 2009, is there really any chance of a successor, considering the specs detailed above, nearly 6 years later?
If this new Nikon D7200 features the durable build and weather sealing of the D300 then perhaps those still holding on for the elusive D400 will have their answer. Both the Exspeed processor and MultiCAM autofocus are proven winners. 51 AF points and 6 fps is about what you expect, so I guess it all comes down to the ruggedness of the build.
I am one of those with a D300 awaiting the next evolution. It is still a great camera and highly capable. I might also be one of those that has to accept the D7200 is the next step. For those like me who are patiently waiting for a D400, the burning question is – do you really need a D400 when looking at the specs of the Nikon D7200?
All this new Nikon model talk is very interesting but it doesn’t alter the fact that, whatever the spec of your camera, the most important feature is the glass you bolt on to it.
Anyway, time will reveal all in this saga, thanks for reading and feel free to leave your views.
If you liked this article then why not share it with someone you know who will also find it interesting …. thanks![juiz_sps buttons=”facebook, twitter, google, pinterest, digg, linkedin, stumbleupon, mail”]
[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/6″][vc_facebook type=”button_count”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/6″][vc_googleplus][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/6″][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/6″][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/6″][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/6″][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column font_color=”#00478c”][vc_cta h2=”Subscribe to GDMK Images” h2_font_container=”color:%2300478c” h2_google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal” h4_google_fonts=”font_family:Arimo%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” txt_align=”center” color=”sky” add_button=”bottom” btn_title=”Sign me up I want to know about new GDMK Images articles” btn_align=”center” style=”outline” btn_style=”outline” use_custom_fonts_h2=”true” use_custom_fonts_h4=”true” btn_button_block=”true” btn_color=”sky” shape=”round” btn_shape=”round” btn_size=”md” btn_link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fstaging.gdmkimages.co.uk%2Fsubscribe-gdmk-images-newsletters%2F||”]
Be the first to know when new GDMK Images articles are available
Christmas Orders - We Currently Have A High Level of Personalised Orders. If You Want Any Personalised Items For Christmas Please Order As Soon As Possible!! Dismiss
